Hope everyone is doing well. Dan O'Neill is with the team in Nashville. I will catch them in Winnipeg and be on the rest of the road trip. Should be a lot of storylines over the next 10 days, especially with the trading deadline coming up Monday.
There is definitely some difference of opinion in Washington between the Caps and Hamrlik. Hunter was planning to scratch him next week. If the Blues are interested, they would not have to give up Chris Stewart, nor should they. The Caps perhaps would be excited to get out of Hamrlik's $3.5 million salary next year. I would think draft picks or maybe a defenseman.
Yes, the ownership situation is certainly preventing Armstrong from making any major additions. He's believed to be in a situation where he's trading dollar for dollar and typically that doesn't allow you to improve your team.
Perron was placed on the fourth line after a couple of turnovers. They were juggled throughout the night, but it was pretty obvious that Hitchcock was sending Perron a message.
Not much sense unless a team thought they could either A) Play Bishop in 17 games (time is running out) or B) Re-sign him before July 1. Bishop would have all the leverage in the second situation, so it wouldn't make a lot of sense. Team may wait, give up nothing and then try to sign him in the summer.
To my knowledge, the Blues didn't submit a complaint about the Clutterbuck hit on Pietrangelo, but there are times when we don't hear about those complaints. But keep in mind, a team doesn't have to voice its displeasure for a hit to be reviewed. Shanahan says the league reviews five or six hits a night without hearing from anybody.
That's a very fair observation. Hitch likes to play his top players on the special teams and it's worked for him in the past. The main concern is one of those players taking a puck off the foot. But there is also a fatigue factor. How many shorthanded goals do we see as a result of these guys on the ice? A few ... Backes scored one the other day. But is it worth it at the expense of their energy levels. A guy like Crombeen helped the Blues have the No. 1 overall PK in the league a couple of years ago.
All the games are important, but yes, because of the reasons you mentioned, this six-game road trip is critical. If the Blues limp through the trip 1-5, they could be in some trouble. There are some winnable games on this trip and after a couple of tough losses, it's imperative that the Blues regain their footing.
I don't believe he had any intentions of dealing for a forward BEFORE the Langenbrunner injury. But now he may be forced to. Steen hasn't been on the ice with the team the past couple of days and D'Agostini hasn't been seen since he left the ice in Ottawa. Yes, you're getting Langenbrunner back in four weeks, but things could look a lot different by then. The Blues are teetering on the edge health-wise with their forwards, so Armstrong will be scouring the market.
I don't have the breakdown in front of me, but I earlier in the season, Elliott was receiving more goal support ... As far as compensation for Bishop, the Blues have a price tag out there. I don't know what it is. It could be a 1st, it could be a 2nd. But I've heard from outside sources that teams may be offering 4th rounders and I don't think that's going to cut it with the Blues.
Gosh, I hope he brings back some turkey, mac and cheese and cornbread. The turkey from Jack's BBQ in Nashville is like M&Ms ... melts in your mouth.
Halak is fine. He sat on the bench last night and is expected to start tonight against Nashville.
Just because Hitchcock coached him before doesn't mean he wants to coach him again. Columbus may not want to trade him within the division, but the Blues aren't interested. The contract doesn't make sense with the Blues' ownership situation and even if that weren't the case I don't believe the Blues would be interested.
It may not make 100 percent sense with the way the Blues' defense has been playing (before last night) and with the money Hamrlik's due next season ($3.5 million), but the Blues will need depth and veteran experience in the playoffs. The same could be said for every team, but if the Blues have a chance to help themselves now, I believe it makes sense.
The team has acknowledged its a concussion situation, but they don't know any more than you or I about his timetable. No reason to comment.
He did play well last night. One would like to think that it's the start of something, but until he puts a string of games together, I don't know that too many folks are ready to buy into it yet. But he did look good and perhaps Hitchcock calling him out recently played a role.
I believe that the Blues, for the longest time, didn't want to look at it as a rivarly. They had Chicago and Detroit and Nashville was just kind of a pest. But now that Nashville has been able to sustain its status in the league for several year now, and the Blues have played many close games with them, it's developing into a pretty interesting matchup. It helps that Trotz and Hitchcock go way back.
I believe he'll still be with the Blues unless a trade proposal is overwhelming, which I wouldn't expect. There is the thought process that with Stewart's contract being up after the year, and he'll be a restricted free agent, the Blues may be able to get him cheap, and if he bounces back they'll have a bargain on their hands. He scored 28 goals twice, so it was no fluke.
As far as I know, everyone came out unscathed. Dan O'Neill is with the team in Nashville.
That would be a VERY tight series. I think either team could win, but with the way the season series has gone this year, you'd have to give the edge to Nashville right now. Rinne is 4-0 against the Blues with a 1.20 GAA and a .967 save-percentage. Only way the Blues turn that around is somehow solving Rinne.
He just came off a lengthy point streak, so I think he's happy with his play. Last night, he was bounced to the right wing on Berglund's line, and then demoted to the fourth line after a couple of turnovers, so that might explain his frustrations last night.
I'm assuming you're talking about offensive production. If so, yes, the Blues have the talent to score more goals. But keep in mind, Hitchcock is coaching his style and also to capitalize on the way the team was built. The team limits the number of shots against and tries to keep the puck out of the net. From there, they try to create offensive chances. They don't take as many risks as other teams. Yes it limits their opportunities, but they've shown that they can be successful keeping the goal total low and winning.
I asked Hitchcock last night if he saw any similarities between the two losses and he said no. Against Chicago, they didn't have a solid effort from the entire lineup. The effort was fairly good last night across the board, but there were simply too many turnovers. You'd like to think the results will fire them up, but we'll have to wait and see tonight.