Hope everybody's doing well today. The Blues just wrapped up practice and interviews at the Mills. Hopefully I have some info to answer your questions. Let's get chattin...
Perhaps if the Blues hadn't re-signed Elliott that would be an option. I like Bishop and think he has a great future, but the Blues want two NHL-tested goalies going down the stretch and there are no plans to trade Elliott.
Crombeen isn't the only one in jeopardy of losing his spot in the lineup. Hitchcock said today that effort isn't going to cut it from here on out. Playing time will be based on performance. When I asked if that meant established forwards, he said everybody. The Blues like Crombeen's toughness, so I think he has a future here. He just may not be in the lineup every game if everyone is healthy.
Berglund somehow needs to find a way to finish more of his chances. D'Agostini can be more effective in a few areas. And Langenbrunner is playing smart, but he could add a little more offense.
I suppose it would depend on how long the series goes. My initial reaction was no, not a successful year. But if the Blues play a seven-game series against Detroit and lose 3-2 at Joe Louis to end their season, there are some positives in that type of season. This is a franchise that hasn't won a SINGLE playoff game in quite a long time. However, I think many fans would not be happy unless this team could make an appearance in the second round. The club has proved it can play with many of the top teams in the league.
This is Mike Smith: Hang in there, please ... Jeremy is working the chat from the Blues' practice rink at St. Louis Mills and temporarily lost wireless access.
OK, I'm back. I must be too close to a Blues' power play meeting. I was going to the (inter) net and couldn't make a connection.
I don't think there's a chance Steen or McDonald will play Friday and probably not Saturday either. Both skated with the extra line in practice today and Hitchcock said afterwards he hasn't heard a peep about them being ready.
Halak is confirmed for Friday. Hitchcock said he wasn't sure about Saturday, but he hoped to give Elliott the start Tuesday in his return to Ottawa.
There is a chance Huskins could be ready by Tuesday. That gives the Blues seven and either Huskins or Russell is likely a healthy scratch. The team could win with that, but I think they would like to explore the market for another defensive-minded guy with playoff experience. San Jose people have told me Huskins was very good in the playoffs when healthy, but coming off a long-term injury, I don't know how much you can count on him.
Slim to none. Don't need another young guy, plus his asking price is going to be more than he's probably worth. What would you give up? Not going to give up a young forward.
It's kind of unclear at this point. The NHL says it will postpone realignment for one year, but if they don't come up with a plan that the NHLPA will sign off on, then it could be different or it could be postponed longer.
You're referring to Khavanov's comments about why Tarasenko might not be ready to come to the NHL. I did not see where Khavanov specifically discussed St. Louis as being a negative. From what I read, he mentioned the upcoming CBA issues and Hitchcock (who for whatever reason has a reputation of not liking Russians) being the coach. Whether or not St. Louis has a reputation of not being a favorable place to play for some Europeans, my guess is that they're many more with a different opinion.
The Blues had no choice but to change the personel groupings. It's nice to have two decent units, but if neither are scoring, it's not helping the team. I'm interested to see how the No. 1 unit with Backes, Perron, Oshie, Shattenkirk and Pietrangelo fares Friday.
I don't think we can assess what type of spenders the Stillman group will be until they take over. I agree, though, that the perception coming in that they won't be making headlines across the league with massive free-agent contracts. That doesn't make sense in the St. Louis business model until the franchise is on firm footing. But what the group does bring is stability, as you said, and any stability at this point would be a good thing.
Backes, Shattenkirk and maybe Oshie (USA), Pietrangelo (Canada), Halak (Slovakia), Polak (Czech Republic) ... and possibly Berglund (Sweden).
If the current ownership were staying in place, and the last couple of years had been smooth, it's very possible the NHL would be interested in bringing an NHL all-star game to St. Louis. Dave Checketts has discussed the AS game and the Winter Classic with the league. But when the air started coming out of this ownership group, that stuff has been put on hold. Even with a stable ownership, the Blues will have to wait their turn on the Winter Classic. The league is doing Columbus a favor by bringing the spotlight to a market that has a solid ownership but has a team that has been struggling on the ice.
Arnott and Langenbrunner are enough up front, unless they Blues go after a goal scorer who also happens to bring veteran experience. But if the Blues decide they want to get an offensive player, I don't think that player has to be mid-30s or older.
If you could lock Parise up long-term, I would definitely give up a first-round pick. I understand your comparison to the Hawks, and while I believe the Blues' young forward are talented, Toews and Kane have proven more and Hossa is a premier player. I like Parise, but I don't think Parise is Hossa. So it's close, but the Hawks at that stage might have been just a notch above where the Blues are now.
I was in Ottawa and asked the NHL about a timetable on the Stillman purchase. Bill Daly said March, which is obviously after the Feb. 27 trade deadline. Another source has told me that it could happen sooner. If the sale happens before Feb. 27, even days before, I'm told it is possible the new ownership could give the go-ahead to management to infuse more money into the payroll. So yes, Army could have more flexibility if the sale is completed before the deadline.
There will be a trickle-down effect and you might have a guy like Stewart on the third line and Sobotka, D'Agostini or Langenbrunner on the fourth line, but that doesn't mean the fourth line is a scoring line. It would add offensive depth for sure, but you still need a hard-checking line.
I believe the NHL has taken a big step in reducing concussions and changing the culture of players playing through them, as they did in the past. It would have been better if some of these measures were taken years ago, but you can't go back now. You're never going to take the potential of serious injury, including concussions, out of the game. I don't know how much more the league can do than it is right now.
In a straight-up one-for-one trade, I don't think they could get a player who has 20 goals at this point in the season for Bishop. I think Bishop's stock is very high right now, but people have to keep in mind that there are a lot of teams in the hunt right now. If you're in the hunt, you have a good goalie. You're thinking about your backup goalie, or your No. 1 goalie for the future. As teams fall out of the race, that may happen ... but not now. I've said that I think trading Bishop would be beneficial to the Blues if they deal him in a package for a scorer. You might have to give up more than Bishop, but he would be really attractive to teams if more was included.
That will be interesting to watch. If the Blues are completely healthy, I could see them sitting a game or two down the stretch. But more likely, you will see their ice time decrease on some nights.